🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.